This is my desert island wish list, excluding friends or any actual collaborations past, present or future.
1. Adam Cooper, dancer
2. If not the above then Anton du Beke
3. Ben Drew aka Plan B
4. Or Paloma Faith? I'd have to meet them both to make the final decision.
5. Forced Entertainment
6. Rose English (I'd just be her apprentice)
This list broadly takes in my perception that I think I could actually work with these people. I haven't included visual artists because if I love their work, then I'd just be assisting them, or being a fan around them. I genuinely interested in the idea of making artwork from people outside my own art bubble.
Actually, I really like working with other people, and I'd love to work closely with dancers, perhaps a showgirl? also, I'd love do something in a theatre setting, so perhaps a writer too?
Right, well, let's see what Santa brings from that lot...
Friday, 17 December 2010
New Work
Wow, this year is hurtling to an end. I always feel like I did barely anything over a year, but perception and reality are strange things. I'm not sure how my year went, I only know what I did not achieve.
I did however have a comforting moment of putting some large new work on the walls of the old S1 Artspace before they moved. Sadly, only for a meeting with my supervisors and also I stepped in and showed the work to my students in my crit group when the student showing texted me concussed in hospital. The work is an ongoing pairing of theatre interior and text bios. The bios are sourced from 1930s cigarette cards or online web presences. The work represents the public viewing spaces of the showgirl and theorists connected to my research. The project will be ongoing throughout my PhD.
Friday, 3 December 2010
Reading and Writing (the Problem)
Argh! A couple of years ago, I felt called upon to really investigate problems my practice threw up (and I mean that phrase). So I started to write; to articulate my thoughts in written form. Now, as I undertake this PhD, I read and write regularly. And the more I know and learn, the more I am embarrassed about anything I have ever written! Can I believe my own front?! I've found some lovely articulations of the problems and thoughts I wish to work through, so I shall quote them here. With great thanks to their author, Craig Owens, whose words here could be re-interpreted into a manifesto. Perhaps I can get into dialogue with them later. Or, I need to confront the problem and take up the challenge of the last sentence.
Among those prohibited from Western representation, whose representations are denied all legitimacy, are women. Excluded from representation by its very structure, they return within it as a figure for—a representation of—the unrepresentable (Nature, Truth, the Sublime etc). This prohibition bears primarily on woman as the subject, and rarely as the object of representation, for there is certainly no shortage of images of women. [ … ] In order to speak, to represent herself, a woman assumes a masculine position; perhaps this is why femininity is frequently associated with masquerade, with false representation, with simulation and seduction.1
What can be said about the visual arts in a patriarchal order that privileges vision over the other senses? Can we not expect them to be a domain of masculine privilege—as their histories indeed prove them to be—a means perhaps, of mastering through representation the “threat” posed by the female? In recent years there has emerged a visual arts practice informed by feminist theory and addressed, more or less explicitly, to the issue of representation and sexuality. [ … ] [W]omen have begun the long-overdue process of deconstructing femininity. Few have produced new, “positive” images of a revised femininity; to do so would simply supply and thereby prolong the life of the existing representational apparatus.2
1. Craig Owens (1992) Beyond Recognition: Representation, Power, and Culture. Berkeley, Los Angeles and London: University of California Press pp 166-190, p.170.
2. Ibid p.180.
Sunday, 21 November 2010
My Song (With Thanks to Laura Mulvey and Kander and Ebb / All That Jazz)
1.
In a world ordered by sexual imbalance,
pleasure in looking has been split between active/male and passive/female.
The determining male gaze projects its phantasy onto the female figure, which is sty~~~led accordingly.
In their traditional exhibitionist role women are simultaneously looked at
and
displayed,
2.
with their appearance coded for strong visual impact
so~that they can be said to connote to-be-looked-at~~~-ness.
Woman displayed as sexual object is leitmotif of erotic spectacle: from pin ups to strip-tea~~~se,
from Ziegfeld to Busby Berkeley, she holds the look, plays to
and signifies
male desire.
3.
Mainstream film neatly combined spectacle and narrative.
(Note~however, how in the musical song-and-dance numbers interrupt the flow
of the diegesis.) The presence of woman is an indispensable element of spectacle in normal narrative film,
yet her visual presence tends to work against the development of a
story-
line.
Gilda's Song: Put the Blame on Mame
1.
When they had the earthquake in San Francisco
Back in nineteen-six
They said old Mother Nature
Was up to her old tricks
That’s the story that went around
But here’s the real lowdown
Put the blame on Mame, boys
Put the blame on Mame
One night she started to shim and shake
That brought on the Frisco quake
So you can put the blame on Mame, boys
Put the blame on Mame
2.
They once had a shootin’ up in the Klondike
When they got Dan McGrew
Folks were putting the blame on
The lady known as Lou
That’s the story that went around
But here’s the real lowdown
Put the blame on Mame, boys
Put the blame on Mame
Mame did a dance called the hootchie-coo
That’s the thing that slew McGrew
Put the blame on Mame, boys
Put the blame on Mame
Judy Confronts the Audience
Go on, laugh, get your money’s worth. No one’s going to hurt you. I know you want me to tear my clothes off so you can look your fifty cents’ worth. Fifty cents for the privilege of staring at a girl the way your wives won’t let you. What do you suppose we think of you up here with your silly smirks your mothers would be ashamed of? We know it’d the thing of the moment for the dress suits to come and laugh at us too. We’d laugh right back at the lot of you, only we’re paid to let you sit there and roll your eyes and make your screamingly clever remarks. What’s it for? So you can go home when the show’s over, strut before your wives and sweethearts and play at being the stronger sex for a minute? I’m sure they see through you. I’m sure they see through you just like we do![1]
[1] Judy’s direct address to the audience in Dorothy Arzner’s (1940) Dance, Girl, Dance [film], RKO Radio Pictures.
Monday, 30 August 2010
Watching the Vegas Showgirl
Whilst in Vegas I watched the following shows; Crazy Girls, X-Burlesque and Vegas The Show! The first two were small scale revues. Crazy Girls (http://www.lasvegas-nv.com/crazy-girls.htm) featured a variety of female dancers, some with excellent training and performance-personality, whilst others who seemed to specialise in their boob job. I was unfortunate enough to get a front-row seat, which meant that I felt like my gaze was on view to the audience, and the dancers, I became self-conscious. Wonderful dancing meant I could get over myself, but a large foam penis-prop used to sit on in one number made me so unbelively embarrased and made the whole show tacky, rather than knowingly tacky in a guilty pleasure way. However, the show was fun overall.
X-Burlesque was a lack-lustre amateur job, nothing burlesque about it (http://shop.vegas.com/shows/showtimes2.jsp?show=1007#show_review). Totally unworthy of the word burlesque. The dancers were standard, with little charisma, and the numbers felt they owed much to the R'n' B video genre - if only they could be competently danced. Pretty darned awful.
Vegas The Show! (http://www.vegastheshow.com/) proved even Vegas can have moments of self-reflexivity, and this large-scale musical looked back on the past glories of the town and quite incredibly, paid tribute to Sammy Davis Jr who had to fight incredible overt racism in order to enter through the front door at a venue in which he was top-billing. A wonderful old-style revue to put a spring in my step.
X-Burlesque was a lack-lustre amateur job, nothing burlesque about it (http://shop.vegas.com/shows/showtimes2.jsp?show=1007#show_review). Totally unworthy of the word burlesque. The dancers were standard, with little charisma, and the numbers felt they owed much to the R'n' B video genre - if only they could be competently danced. Pretty darned awful.
Vegas The Show! (http://www.vegastheshow.com/) proved even Vegas can have moments of self-reflexivity, and this large-scale musical looked back on the past glories of the town and quite incredibly, paid tribute to Sammy Davis Jr who had to fight incredible overt racism in order to enter through the front door at a venue in which he was top-billing. A wonderful old-style revue to put a spring in my step.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)